top of page

After spending the last year conducting AI professional development sessions across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and beyond, I've worked with well over 500 educators. Attendees ranged from skeptical superintendents to enthusiastic early adopter teachers.


Whether presenting at Pennsylvania Intermediate Units, at districts' in-service days, or via Zoom at specialized workshops, I've observed patterns that determine whether AI integration succeeds or fails in K-12 settings.


Here's what I've learned about making AI work in real classrooms:


The Biggest Pitfalls

1. The All-or-Nothing Approach

The most common mistake I see is districts adopting extreme positions: either banning AI outright or mandating its use in every classroom without proper support.

Neither works. The districts seeing success take a nuanced approach, creating clear but flexible guidelines that empower teachers to experiment within boundaries.


2. Prioritizing Tools Over Purpose

Many schools jump straight to tool recommendations ("use Claude for this, ChatGPT for that") without first establishing why they're incorporating AI.

Technology without purpose leads to superficial implementation. The most successful districts start with concrete instructional goals, then identify how AI supports those objectives.


3. Ignoring Student Input

I've consistently noticed that schools rarely include student perspectives when creating AI policies. This is a massive oversight.

Today's students often understand these tools better than we do. The districts seeing the smoothest transitions actively involve student representatives in policy development, creating buy-in and surfacing insights adults might miss.


Quick Wins Anyone Can Implement

1. The 5-Minute Classroom Check-In

Instead of complex implementation plans, start with simple routines: at the beginning of class, spend five minutes asking students to share how they've used AI for learning in the past week.

This low-stakes approach normalizes discussion, surfaces creative applications, and helps teachers understand students' actual usage patterns.


2. The Department-Level Prompt Library

One high school English department I worked with created a shared Google Doc where teachers contributed effective prompts they'd tested with students. Within a semester, they'd built a valuable resource that especially helped less tech-savvy colleagues to integrate AI.


3. "AI Fridays"

Designating just one piece of one class period (e.g., on Fridays) for intentional AI exploration goes a long way. On "AI Fridays," students can work on regular assignments, but they are also explicitly encouraged to use AI tools, documenting their processes and learning along the way. This contained approach prevents the "Wild West" feeling many teachers fear while creating structured opportunities for skill development. This is also a great way for educators to learn more about the kind of work that students enjoy doing with AI.


The One Takeaway That Changes Everything

If there's one insight I'd highlight above all others, it's this:


Successful K12 AI integration isn't about technology, it's about transparency.


When teachers are explicit about:

  • When AI use is permitted vs. prohibited

  • What they actually value in student work

  • Why certain tasks remain AI-free while others incorporate these tools

...students respond with greater engagement and integrity.


When we pretend AI tools don't exist, or when we create AI policies that we cannot realistically enforce, we lose our credibility with students. The districts enjoying the greatest successes right now are those having honest conversations with students, teachers, and the community about how education is changing with AI. Transparency is the key that unlocks the shift.


Want to start these conversations in your district? Let me help you!


Book a Video Call with me or fill out an interest form to explore how we can work together.


Dr. Cristofer Slotoroff | February 25th, 2025



ree

Hi Folks,


Last summer, I was asked to lead an all-day professional learning session at Central Intermediate Unit 10 in State College, PA. I presented that day to a group of superintendents, assistant superintendents, directors of curriculum, and building leaders on artificial intelligence (AI), large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude. 


My session’s goal was straightforward: give attendees the necessary knowledge and understanding to craft AI use policies for their school districts, buildings, departments, and classrooms. As the topic itself—educational AI academic policies—is brand new, the day included many great questions and even better conversations.


All in all, it was a busy, productive, thought-provoking day. I love to present at IUs in general, and that day was no exception.


Earlier this month, I was asked to lead another professional development session at an Intermediate Unit. This time, it was for classroom educators: middle and high school ELA teachers at Carbon-Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21. My session was designed to help these educators to shift their takes on AI from “obstacle” to “opportunity.”


… Of course, that’s what most AI + pedagogy sessions are about these days, aren’t they?


You know how it goes: some consultant comes in and tells you to drink the Kool-Aid, to use this platform, to leverage that tool, to like and subscribe, blah blah blah…


My approach is different. I begin with validation.


As a longtime AP Language & Composition teacher, school district administrator, published education researcher on the topic of AI, I begin by validating educators’ resistance to AI-inclusive classrooms. 


More often than not, teachers’ skepticism is well-founded. It’s also rooted in both empirical and theoretical understanding; it’s a wariness derived from valid concerns about academic integrity, the seismically shifting nature of student learning, and a quaking foundation underneath the very purpose of what we center within the instructional process. Further: all of that skepticism is to say nothing of the decades of professional development sessions falsely promising classroom teachers that adding [insert: edtech tool du jour] will “revolutionize” teaching. Yet, here we are: assigning essays on The American Dream and The Great Gatsby, dissecting Atticus’s closing remarks during the Tom Robinson trial, linking the Salem Witch Trials to McCarthyism, and more.


At the same time, uncritically validating the entirety of either school district administrators’ and teachers’ resistance to AI risks missing the crucial point: 


AI isn't just another tool to restrict. AI requires a fundamental shift in how knowledge is accessed, applied, evaluated, oriented, and assessed in the modern classroom.


Ever-time-constrained educators reading this post might worry that a “fundamental shift” sounds awfully laborious and clunky.


Well, let me put that to rest. During my most session for CLIU21, I emphasized several clear, easy-to-implement principles for teaching in the AI era:


  1. Raise the Bar: Now that students have powerful tools at their disposal, we should challenge them to build more sophisticated products. The goal is not “to prevent AI use,” but “to elevate what students can accomplish with it.”

  2. Expand Traditional Parameters: Instead of focusing solely on “accuracy” or “adherence to instructions,” as measures of excellence, we need to evaluate students' ingenuity, efficiency, and creativity in solving problems.

  3. Be Explicit and Honest: Teachers should clearly communicate which technologies are permitted for specific tasks and be realistic about time expectations. This transparency builds trust and helps students develop better judgment about when and how to use AI tools. Without candor here, we risk turning school into a disingenuous academic pantomime.

  4. Real World Connections Are Not a “Bonus” Anymore: Every assignment—yes, EVERY assignment—should have a clear answer to "why are we doing this?" The answer should increasingly reflect the AI-integrated world our students will enter after graduation. We cannot prepare students to enter the world that we inhabited. We must educate students to enter the world that awaits them.


To turn these concepts into action, I made sure that teachers could take back real, applicable understandings and tools right back to their classrooms for tomorrow’s lessons.


This brings me to the next way that I differentiate myself from other AI/Education presenters:


I make sure to both cover and distinguish the big picture, conceptual changes that take time to implement from ready-to-go, executable strategies that will work right now. 


After all, even teachers cannot reinvent themselves overnight. 


Some changes take time, and that’s both normal and okay. 


Want to book me for an in-person or Zoom PD session? Contact me here.


- Dr. Cristofer Slotoroff

February 24th, 2025

Updated: Feb 25



Enjoying a Parisian Breakfast in 2022
Enjoying a Parisian Breakfast in 2022

Hi Folks,


I’m Dr. Cristofer Slotoroff. Call me Cris! I’m based in Philadelphia, PA.


I’m reaching out to let you know that you can book me as a consultant for your next in-person or virtual professional development session. 


Whether it’s AI (artificial intelligence) and ChatGPT in schools, writing acceptable use policies for large language models in classroom contexts, or helping students and teachers to develop better relationships with their devices, I’d love to bring a research-driven, practitioner’s perspective to you and your colleagues.


Let me tell you a little bit about how and why I do what I do:


I sat through a LOT of bad professional development as a teacher and as an administrator. What made this fact even more frustrating was that I worked with a LOT of great teachers. If there are so many great teachers, well, why was so much PD so…bad?


Well, since 2020, I’ve been trying to make sure that the training and professional learning sessions I conduct are dynamic, fun, practical, not forced or contrived, and—above all—genuinely useful. 


That brings me to today: February 24th, 2025.


I had actually started this blog with my colleague, Marc Martorana, a few years ago as part of our Mindful Tech Initiative (MTI) project. Now, I am reviving it because the topics we addressed in our sessions are only becoming more relevant by the day:


- AI in Education

- Information Literacy

- Students’ and Teachers’ Relationships with Educational Technology

- Cultivating Academic Integrity in the AI Era

- Shifts in Public Education

- Changing Attitudes Toward Postsecondary Learning

… and a lot more.


If you have an interest in these topics, I’d love to work with you and your colleagues!


I’ve spent most of my life learning and teaching: 

- I was a high school English teacher for well over a decade in two NJ school districts

- I was a school district administrator in a third NJ district

- I’ve published research on K-12 education, artificial intelligence (AI), identity, and technology

- I was an adjunct graduate professor of research methods at Fairleigh Dickinson University

- I’ve worked as a project-based consultant for Harvard University and Carnegie Learning


Today, I continue to be immersed in pedagogy:

- I serve as a consultant to school district administrators and classroom teachers

- I work as a vendor for an educational technology company

- I have several edtech projects in the works


Outside of this stuff, I’m a human being:

- I love soccer, and I play, watch, and coach it whenever I can

- I surf…especially where I grew up, outside of Atlantic City, NJ

- I enjoy recording music with my band, The Deafening Colors

- I build handwound, single coil pickups for offset-waist guitars

- I read a lot, and these days, I’m pretty into nonfiction

- I’ve lived in NYC, Jersey City, Hoboken, Weehawken, Easton, St. Louis, and more


Want to book me for an in-person or Zoom PD session? Contact me here.


- Dr. Cristofer Slotoroff

February 23rd, 2025


  • Calendly
  • Orcid ID
  • Linkedin

© Copyright 2025 | Dr. Cristofer Slotoroff & HipNoPaideia T&L, LLC | All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page